Comparison

Proofpoint Alternative: TrustStrike Simulate vs Proofpoint

Evaluating a Proofpoint alternative for phishing simulation? See how TrustStrike Simulate measures what an attacker actually does after the click, not just who clicked.

Supported Not supported Not sure

If you want a Proofpoint alternative for phishing simulation, TrustStrike Simulate is built for the part most awareness products do not measure: what happens after someone clicks. Proofpoint is best known as an email security and DLP suite, and its Security Awareness simulations (the former Wombat product) focus on click-based reporting and training. TrustStrike picks up where that ends, carrying a campaign through AiTM/MiTM session hijacking, Browser-in-the-Middle, ClickFix, consent phishing, and malicious file drop to show what an intruder would actually walk away with.

Think Metasploit, but for phishing. With 62% of breaches involving a human element (Verizon DBIR 2026), TrustStrike pressure-tests that human across email, SMS, QR, WhatsApp, and USB, using infrastructure that mirrors live attacker tradecraft rather than a sandboxed click counter.

Why teams choose TrustStrike over Proofpoint

Measures breach impact, not click rate

Proofpoint's awareness simulations center on who clicked and reported. TrustStrike carries the same campaign through session theft and remote code execution, so your metric is real compromise rather than a click percentage.

Five delivery vectors out of the box

Proofpoint's simulation strengths are email and QR phishing, including print-scan QR. TrustStrike adds SMS, WhatsApp, and USB drop so your test matches the channels attackers actually mix today.

Reproduces MFA-bypass tradecraft

We are not aware of native AiTM session-theft or BiTM simulation in Proofpoint's awareness product. TrustStrike runs these on bring-your-own-domain setups with proxies and redirector pages to validate whether MFA actually holds.

Proofpoint alternative FAQ

Is TrustStrike a good Proofpoint alternative?

For phishing simulation, yes. TrustStrike Simulate is a strong Proofpoint alternative when you want to test beyond click rate, exercising AiTM session hijacking, BiTM, and consent phishing across email, SMS, QR, WhatsApp, and USB.

What is the best Proofpoint alternative for phishing simulation?

It depends on what you need to prove. If the goal is validating outcomes like MFA bypass and session theft instead of click counts, the best Proofpoint alternative is a tool like TrustStrike Simulate that exercises the attack past the initial click.

Proofpoint vs TrustStrike Simulate - what's the difference?

It comes down to depth. Proofpoint is an email security and awareness suite whose simulations focus on email and QR phishing and click reporting, while the TrustStrike Simulate Proofpoint alternative continues through AiTM, BiTM, ClickFix, malicious file drop, and remote code execution.

Why do teams switch from Proofpoint to TrustStrike for simulation?

Teams adopt the TrustStrike Proofpoint alternative once click-and-report metrics stop telling them whether a real attack would succeed. TrustStrike adds session hijacking, consent phishing, and multi-channel campaigns over SMS, WhatsApp, and USB on top of the email basics.

Does Proofpoint simulate session hijacking or MFA bypass?

We are not aware of native AiTM/MiTM session hijacking, BiTM, or session theft in Proofpoint's awareness simulations. The TrustStrike Proofpoint alternative runs these techniques on bring-your-own-domain infrastructure with proxies and redirector pages to test MFA bypass directly.

Test what attackers actually do.

Proofpoint stops at the click. TrustStrike Simulate runs the full attack. See it on your own stack.